Section & 13 Su Case Pre-trial Trial Half-Suit Land Sentence The court ruled in favor of the pre-emptor because both the premier-importer and the seller were as affiliate owners' appellate court, however, It was completely rejected because before this the inquiry was made by Shijra Kishtwar of Khasra No. 1, that the particular Khasra Khasra was the Khasra number / Khasra was the Khasra number. And the plaintiff was the owner of two different measles which were adjacent to the other areas in one block and one of the two measles appellate courts. The misunderstanding was but found that the plaintiff was affiliated with the Being who is the owner of measles khsra, was able to prove his former right and it was rightly recognized. / The trial court excluded half of the suit land because both he and the shopkeeper had equal rights to premature privilege. The court, under which the plaintiff was ineligible, was set aside and the trial court reinstated. Gone
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
