MURAD ALI versus ASSISTANT POLITICAL AGENT, LANDI KOTAL
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 247 (7), the constitutional jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the tribal areas, the petitioner of the Supreme Court and the High Court had demanded the issuance of a proper writ, which would have led them on this basis. Are directing the release. They were detained under section 40 of the Frontier Crimes Regulation, 1901, without any rhyme or reason and with no material present on the record, as prosecutors said, since the applicant was also involved in the Explosives Act. , Involved in the 1908 case. The premises were transferred to Landi Kotal, the High Court had no jurisdiction to proceed in view of the provisions contained in Article 247 (7) of the Contempt of Matter, but to be exchanged. No attempt was made. For so long he was charged with felony crimes, from judicial detention to the custody of the investigating agency, and received much more attention than required section 40 of the M Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901. There should be no use in dealing with crime, but security measures were available to guarantee law and order in the tribal areas to maintain law and order in the area. It was not only compulsory but it was the jurisdiction of the High Court to execute itself under Article 199 of the constitution to relieve a person who was illegally imprisoned. In the present case, it was otherwise, in the constitution, With all guarantees, the basic rights will be reduced to a mockery. , Which is never intended by its fraudsters
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
