JEHANZEB KHAN versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD THROUGH SECRETARY
Section 52 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Constitution Petitionability Petition prayed for the claim that the entire constituency election was declared illegal, void and illegal and the petitioner's illegal complaint was that The authority suddenly changed the information to the polling station and it was contested to favor the respondents at the expense of other candidates, and this change of polling station caused the voters of the area to face many difficulties. Petitioner also claimed that the applicant's allegations regarding the relocation of the polling station and the transfer of the polling station to the polling station, allegedly for the support of some candidates, stemmed from a factual dispute over the need for recording evidence. Concerned, they were not in the capacity of the Election Commission, which could not have been in extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction. Such a complaint by the High Court can only be provocative, before the Election Tribunal constituted under section 52 of the Public Representation Act 1976, which stated that no election other than an election petition would be questioned, Article 225 of the Constitution also stated that there is no dispute in relation to elections in the House. Or any Provincial Assembly shall be called as a question, except through an election petition, since there was a dispute of realism in this matter and under the Public Representation Act, Article 52 of Article 1976 and Article 225 of the Constitution The applicant had alternative, appropriate and effective treatment. , The applicant had to resolve his complaint before the Election Tribunal and he was required to comply with Article 199 of the Constitution.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
