Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Section 4 was upset over not promoting public servants on the principles of publicity The Service Tribunal dismissed appeals filed by government employees. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal regarding their service to regulate their advertising in accordance with the rules and regulations.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH through Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Quetta v. Dr. ZAHIDA KAKAR 2009 PLC(CS) 206
• MUMTAZ UD DIN FEROZE v. Sheikh IFTIKHAR ADIL 2009 PLD 207
• AUQAF DEPARTMENT through Chief Administrator Auqaf, Punjab, Lahore v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS ZAKAT, USHAR AND MINORITIES AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMAB 2009 SCMR 210
• MUHAMMAD KALEEM RATHORE v. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS 2009 CLD 212
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 of 2007 2009 PLD 217
• AHMED BROTHER TRADE INTERNATIONAL, WALIABAD GULMIT HUNZA, GILGIT v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE, RAWALPINDI/ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 218
• MUSTAFA KAMAL v. DAUD KHAN 2009 SCMR 221
• COLLECTOR OF LAND ACQUISITION, ABBOTTABAD v. Alhaj SARDAR BAHADUR KHAN 2009 SCMR 224

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Lasbela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes