Find a Lawyer

AUQAF DEPARTMENT THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS ZAKAT, USHAR AND MINORITIES AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMAB

Jurisdiction of the Constitution High Court scope jurisdiction, when the quest filed by the authorities through a certificate, cannot be interfered with by the High Court in exercising the constitutional jurisdiction, if the certificate If written, the defendant acted on evidence that was legally unacceptable or refused to accept admissible evidence or if any evidence of the disclosure was recorded Was not supported and if in such cases the error would be equivalent to the error of law

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ARMY WELFARE SUGAR MILLS, WORKERS\' UNION v. ARMY WELFARE SUGAR MILLS 2009 SCMR 202
• AHMAD RIAZ SHEIKH v. State 2009 PLD 202
• GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH through Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Quetta v. Dr. ZAHIDA KAKAR 2009 PLC(CS) 206
• MUMTAZ UD DIN FEROZE v. Sheikh IFTIKHAR ADIL 2009 PLD 207
• MUHAMMAD KALEEM RATHORE v. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS 2009 CLD 212
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 215
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 of 2007 2009 PLD 217
• AHMED BROTHER TRADE INTERNATIONAL, WALIABAD GULMIT HUNZA, GILGIT v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE, RAWALPINDI/ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 218

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes