CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus JAVED AHMAD
The Pre-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 2A misconduct mandatory retirement employee was neither treated fairly nor was there any inquiry by the department officials in the matter, even though the service tribunal According to the merits of this case, the matter was remanded. The case and it formed its previous opinion and on the basis of other complaints, the employee was subjected to prejudice and the department was not given any opportunity, despite the restoration orders, the employee approved by the High Court joined the job. Which is not allowed. The department had alleged that it had deprived the department of its right to take action on the charge, which included 23 charges, including additional charges, predicted to be malicious and to get rid of employment, Earlier, the service tribunal's employment appeal was dismissed. The High Court had the power to grant that the job be restored from the job. In the present case, the High Court has erroneously found that its intervention could be considered an extraordinary leave without pay, in an unlawful decision. The scope of the jurisdiction was not found to be flawed, weak and illegal, which was maintained by the Supreme Court.
