Article 185 Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 6 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, Appeal to the Supreme Court Against Appellate High Court Decision, Pre-Impression Suit Maintainability Scope Appellant, in the present case, absolute negligence. The litigation over the remedy was used reflects the appellant's negligence in implementing the remedy. Earlier, the appeal would not lie on appeal, and the direct appeal ban imposed no material practice that the Supreme Court was entertaining civil applications for leave. Appealing to cases arising after a pre-trial hearing by the High Court, even if the dispute was first appreciated in court, there was no excuse for the law, because over time, under the Supreme Court Expires more than scheduled. Appeal Rules, 1980, A valuable right had been accumulated in favor of the respondents, which could not be disturbed or destroyed in light of the fact that the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
