Section O15 ()) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 After dismissing the appellant who served as cashier in the bank, he was charged with charge sheet and complete negligence / charge of the bank. I was fired after investigating them. The mini charge against the appellant was that he had received Rs 35 million, but he could not calculate the amount of Rs 2 million for which he could not provide any definitive or satisfactory explanation and, in the circumstances, for the appellant. The same lawyer was embezzled. Because the appellant was acquitted by the Special Court under Section 249A, CCPC, he could not be dismissed or dismissed for employment - each case had to be decided on its own facts, the nature of the two cases being itself. The facts of the present case will be revealed that the allegations against the appellant in the departmental proceedings were that a negligent amount of Rs. 2 lakh had been lost due to his negligence and he had misused the same appellant core. In fact, the gross negligence of negligence must be held accountable for the event which led to the bank's loss of 2 million appellants, even though the amount of money filed against them could have been exonerated on the criminal charges against them. Is. Due to the mismanagement / negligence by them, the proceedings in the department can still be prosecuted, which resulted in the allegation that they were defrauded and which were the allegations leveled against them by the High Court verdict. Was retained, in circumstances and the appeal was dismissed \ r \ n
