SYED RAFIUL QADRE NAQVI versus SYEDA SAFIA SULTANA
Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Second Appeal Scope Results In fact, the suit filed by the plaintiffs was concurrently ruled in their favor by the trial court and the lower appellate court, but the High Court filed the second suit by the defendants. Allowed an appeal as well as set aside the decision. Under the jurisdiction of both courts, either the evidence was irrelevant or irrelevant on the basis of the evidence, or the evidence was misleading in any way even though the non-reading did not read the evidence or the false news was false. The reading can be altered but the High Court erroneously interfered with the finding of facts. The re-examination of the evidence on record under Section 100 CPC resulted in the reversal of factual conclusions. The trial court and the lower appellate court decided the cases on merit on the basis of the definition of evidence on the record, and the oral and documentary documents had rightly concluded that the plaintiff had established his case in the Supreme Court. The decision and order passed by the High Court of Appeal were set aside
