MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD SABIR ANSARI versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, KASUR
Article 9 The selection of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001), Sections 152 and 2 (xxvi) of the Professional Communication Council and client prohibition against the set is reserved for a farmer respondent, who was an appellant's lawyer ( An elected member of the Council), having previously obtained knowledge of the business of the appellant, while taking advantage of this knowledge, not only filed objections against the appellant before the Returning Officer, but also from the other person to the appellant. Also asked to challenge the candidacy. Was not a farmer, but for an industrialist, Section 9 of the Law and Regulations, 1984, was a testimony to the 1984 offer that not only protected the privacy of professional communications, but also the terms of the expression to a lawyer in any way Prohibits the disclosure of information, communications, instruction and advice received, and is not limited to the knowledge of professional events and the tender assistance provided during this time, in the limited event or knowledge of what they receive It is also up to the facts observed by the purpose of his professional job where to file a complaint on a lawyer basis. God was the limit. During his engagements as a lawyer, the knowledge he obtained was not only immoral but also openly violated Section 9 of the Shahadah of the law, a 1984 complaint in which the information was appropriate. No, that couldn't be fun either. The action taken by the forum's presiding officer and pursuing it was invalid and had no legal consequences
