The purpose of determining the reasons for an award and the scope of determining the scope of an award was affected by the award announced by the arbitrators, and the defendants did not present a reason for justifying their award, which led to the civil court's decision. Award was to be given. The court's rule was given the opportunity and authority to examine the reasons for the issue in the dispute by the arbitrators as to how and on what basis the arbitrators had decided the award and would be examined by the civil court. Whether the award or not was based on whimsical grounds, without any basis or reason, or was supported and presented by any basis, evidence and documents, the fate of the parties awarded approval to decide the dispute. Did not go He should be given the award of the court by giving him the authority of the court, which did not have sufficient reasons for it to be rejected and was not applicable. The civil court exercised this effect to the extent that the court should enforce the arbitration award rule and approve the court for change in the form and form of the court's rule, when required by section 26 Compliance with features and requirements. A of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Since the arbitrators gave no reason for deciding the dispute, the Supreme Court set aside the award and also sent the arbitrators to the decision, the Supreme Court directed the arbitrators to Give the parties a full opportunity to prove their case. Appeals were allowed before them
