MST AKHTAR BEGUM versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Comparison of forensic science laboratory suits filed by the bank with section 9 law suits (10 of 1984), section 59 civil procedure code (v. 1908), interpretation of section 12 (2), fraud and misrepresentation aside. In this the judgment was pronounced against the applicant. The guarantor's scope petitioner emphasized the decision and the decree that he did not sign any document in favor of the bank, including the mortgage pledge and the General Power of Attorney, which must be signed by the Vitality Banking Court. The expert must sign the signature to get his or her opinion. The controversial documents were in the writings of the applicant or were forged or forged by someone else not only escaped the attention of the banking court in this important aspect of the case but the High Court did not take notice of it. No person can be held responsible for payment. Otherwise she was not legally obligated to pay but was pressured and forced to pay on some forged or compromised basis. The Aid Documents, a permanent, robust and In view of the strict denial, the Power of Attorney, etc., compared the rejected signatures with their approved signatures and instructed them to make further comparisons with the handwriting expert to finalize the disputed documents. Applicant's Signatures The Supreme Court had also directed that action will be taken against the applicant after the receipt of a written expert's report by the relevant banking court.
