Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus MST. NOOR BIBI

Sections 118 and 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Exchange `` In the present case, the applicant was not a party to the dispute in exchange, because at the time of filing, they were not. There was only a contract for transfer of the property and the sale under their favor, under which they had no rights or title, the applicants stepped in the shoes of the original owner, and the decision in this case, which is still the final limit. Had reached The transfer of property was concerned, they were bound to be exchanged / the matter was decided by a court of competent jurisdiction and it was declared as valid, as commenced by the applicant courts below. There can be no dispute in the proceedings, that is, the trial court, the first appellate court, and the high court, together with the facts to determine the question in the case against the applicants, passed the conclusions under which the Supreme Court could not intervene. Remembering the court that even if it could have a different view, the appeal for leave of appeal was dismissed \ r \ n advocates from Kamalia lawyer