Articles 302, 342 and 365 of the Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 40 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (2) (a) hearing of the appeal of the Supreme Court High Court on the unanimous decision passed by the trial court. Had put In view of the comparative nature of the evidence brought to the record by the prosecution of the trial and the High Court evidence, the testimony of the accused was evaluated from the angles by the re-examination, re-examination and the Supreme Court to find out. What material was available to transport the crime to the house and his involvement in the commission of the crime incident was unseen; allegations against the accused demanded ransom and murder, according to evidence that the victim's father was an illiterate person. Was unable to read or write, it was natural but if it did not have complicated consistency Had there been visible and obvious flaws from his supporters. The foundation of the case was raised on the basis of friendly contacts between the accused and the victim. There was no inquiry into the sale of the land and the transaction of business between them, and even the demand for the collection by the father of the man who demanded payment of the letter was a question mark. The children who delivered the said letter to the hotel guard, neither the watchman nor the watchman nor the hotel owner, who read the letter to the victim's father and presented it to the court which meant That the investigators did not perform the duty as guaranteed by the law, the arrest of the suspects has brought to the fore the matter in which the accused made the disclosures and provided concrete indications.
