Find a Lawyer

BRIG. (R.) SAKHI MARJAN, CEO, PESCO, PESHAWAR versus MANAGING DIRECTOR PEPCO, LAHORE

Article 4 (185 ()) terminated the contractual non-employment service employed in the corporation on contractual treatment and was terminated on the basis of the restriction raised by the applicant that no formal inquiry was conducted. Due to which they missed the opportunity to hear it. Was it not necessary that there should be inquiry in each case as it depends on the circumstances of each case? An employee's services can be terminated without regular inquiry as the competent authority can prevent such inquiry, especially When an employee has been charged. The document was proved on the basis of evidence, that the employee of the corporation could not serve in the constitutional or civil jurisdiction to prevent the service from being restored, in violation of the law or in the absence of any legal regulation. Can only claim damages against his dismissal. Or the terminating High Court rendered the right decision Appealing to interfere with the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction to enforce the breach of contract was denied.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mst. FATIMA BIBI v. ALTAF AHMED 2009 SCMR 693
• Mst. IFFAT NAZIR v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Population Welfare Department, Lahore 2009 SCMR 703
• REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION v. Haji GUL HASSAN 2009 SCMR 706
• ZAR MUHAMMAD v. Mian JAFAR SHAH 2009 PLD 707
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. State 2009 PLD 709
• MUHAMMAD FARID KHATTAK v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. 2009 PLC(CS) 712
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES ZONE-II, LAHORE v. LAHORE CANTT. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE 2009 SCMR 715
• FEDERATION \'OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Government of Pakistan v. KHALID JAVED 2009 SCMR 720

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

tax advocates from Dunyapur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes