MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus SYED WAJDI RIZVI
This, in addition to the potential value compensation provided by the 23rd &, & land & land 23 authorities, was increased by the referee judge and the High Court justification rule that the value of the land should be determined according to the purpose and rule. Should have been the buyer of the complaint. Ready to pay and buyers were prepared to charge so fixed a price for the entire land, it had to be taken into consideration the entire land was worth Rs. The year was based on the average price and notice. Under Section 2 (a) of the Finance Act 1992, the land was treated at a cost of Rs. The acquisition year, issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was issued in 1990, while the award was given in three years after 26 years 1993, which included land prices I was horrified by the high court's price / compensation of Rs 7,00,000 per kanal could not be considered illegal so the appeal was dismissed while keeping the judgment.
