Taking advantage of Section 2 302 (b) / evidence of evidence did not appear to be a case of doubt, and the prosecution's case was based only on the evidence of the circumstances, and the extra-judicial confession that came from unforgivable sources proved to be a crime and only The case can be used against the accused. Judicial confession by criminals was impossible in the presence of others, because a felony like murder was not usually confessed to the public, additional judicial confession was not proven by any independent source. In the pursuit of the confession, even at the scene of the incident where the victim was allegedly killed, none of the accused had identified him, the trial, in the absence of any evidence. , Could not safely rely on evidence of extra-judicial confession. There was no explanation given at this trial as to why the dagger was recovered on the accused's information and arrived in the laboratory a month and four days after the police sent it to the chemicals. The identifier value of the Examiner's report was confirmed, so, many, however, did not provide evidence in the serologist's marathon report, the same cannot be said about the dagger. The staining of human blood, so the recovery of the dagger, was, therefore, of no avail to the prosecutor, even when the complainant learned of the deceased that he had previously appeared in the accused's company, He did not timely inform the police of his involvement. In this case the accused and this immunity were fatal to the prosecution's event, therefore,
