Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus MST. ABIDA RAHIM

After proper appreciation of the evidence along with Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) High Court, the first appellate court also recorded contentious facts of fact which did not prove to be granted by the applicant on the suit property. And it was the defendants who were still in possession of the suit property that their forefathers had built, in their first suit to occupy the property on the basis of the property filed by the petitioner, No mention of gift making was made by his father on suit property, high court decision, Supreme TM is not guaranteed by the weakness of any kind, requested leave to appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK v. LAEEQ AHMED 2009 SCMR 301
• PIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 303
• Mirza FARHAN AHMED v. State 2009 SCMR 304
• ABDUL RASHEED v. State 2009 SCMR 306
• MUHAMMAD SAFDAR RANA v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2009 SCMR 312
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Education v. DELHI ANGLO ARABIC COLLEGE AND SCHOOLS 2009 SCMR 315
• SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR 2009 SCMR 320
• THE STATE through Directorate-General of Inspection and Internal Audit (Customs and Excise), Karachi v. ZAFAR ALI KHAN 2009 SCMR 323

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

registration advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes