Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR RANA versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section 8 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Promotion Service Tribunal had decided to bring the appeal after scrutinizing all the material available for hearing on the application and this It was a wise decision. According to the seniority list, the applicant's case was not a valid case for publicity since the applicant had retired, and then there was no question of public importance law that the discrimination decision was appropriate and appropriate and There was no illegality or weakness in the decision. Interim warrant arrest was dismissed and denied leave due to merit reduction

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• PIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 303
• Mirza FARHAN AHMED v. State 2009 SCMR 304
• ABDUL RASHEED v. State 2009 SCMR 306
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. Mst. ABIDA RAHIM 2009 SCMR 310
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Education v. DELHI ANGLO ARABIC COLLEGE AND SCHOOLS 2009 SCMR 315
• SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR 2009 SCMR 320
• THE STATE through Directorate-General of Inspection and Internal Audit (Customs and Excise), Karachi v. ZAFAR ALI KHAN 2009 SCMR 323
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 324

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Sehwan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes