ADMINISTRATOR, MUSLIM AUQAF, PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD MOHSIN
Sections 3, 8 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Appeal to the Supreme Court Courts and the High Court did not deal with the property record, as a matter of appeal, in connection with the temple. It was a vacant property which was allotted to the respondents by the competent authority in the Department of Rehabilitation, which, on the court's notice, the lawyer appearing for the Chairman Iwaki Trust Board submitted that all the property belonging to the shrine was the property. Has been declared. In terms of the IQQ trust board approved by the chairman of the board and that the appellant had nothing to do with the property and the Ivy Trust Board will examine the matter and file a reference in this regard if The appropriate council is considered. The defendants submitted that the conclusions obtained by the courts below had been effected and that the property which was allotted to the defendants was neither dedicated property nor the property on which the Evaci Trust Board could make any claim. Is. However, if at any stage, a reference was filed by the latter, the respondents will join the proceedings and present their case to the Supreme Court, in the circumstances, any comment on the merits of the approved order. Refuse to do so, so as not to prejudice the case. On both sides, however, in view of the finding given by the Chairman, the IQV Trust Board, which was cited. And the fact that the appellants did not even challenge it, the appeal filed by the appellant / administrator Muslim Awaq, was dismissed as unenforceable.
