JAN MUHAMMAD SHAH versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, LAHORE
Section 3 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 28 and Article 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Negative possession of the illegal possession applicant did not conclude at any stage and The decree was passed in favor of the passer. The effect was that he heard an eviction petitioner's constitutional petition pending the same day when Maqbool Ahmed and Hekmat-e-Pakistan presented the Supreme Court's decision in SCMR 2063 in 1991, which included the Limitation Act, 1908. Article 28 and Article 144 were announced. In the same way provided for the right to property, the dissimilarity of the integration of Islam, and it was held that the judgment of the Supreme Court would be applicable on a fixed date, in view of the Supreme Court's decision, the applicant's negative The possession application had lost its usefulness, if any, as stated that the decision would not affect any past and closed deal, while in the case of the applicant, there was a matter of negative prospects. The article has never been treated as a past and closed transaction, the decision of the High Court was not subject to any legal weakness. Rather, the High Court, after accepting all aspects of the matter, decided the matter, under which no interference was required by the Supreme Court's request for leave to appeal. \ R \ n
