Sections 9 (c) and 9 (a) review the evidence for recovery of the benefit of the doubt, after the accused's car was found to have reduced marijuana, it was proved that the defendant's accompanying evidence accompanied the defendant. Was injured. When an accident was encountered and their presence was established, none of the prosecution's witnesses had any personal grudge or enmity against the accused so that it could be included in a false case as shown in the FIR. Each packet weighs 170 packets of marijuana. For the purpose of chemical inspection, one kilogram and some amount of char was isolated from each packet. Even if one gram of marijuana was taken from each packet, it was still 170 grams and not 10 grams 1 chemical test. Investigators are isolated / isolated from a packet containing one gram of marijuana, with the possibility of separating 17 grams of marijuana from the same packet through micro tools, therefore, it can not be avoided resulting in the benefit of every doubt. The suspects were convicted under Section 9 (c) of the Drug Control Act 1997, which resulted in the alteration of section 9 (a) and sentenced them earlier. Reduced by duration. Out of it by the circumstances
