Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus IRFAN TARIQ

The Para 11 candidates from the NWFP passed the C-Section Competitive Examination, losing their first choice to the Department in 2003, on the basis that the C-Section Competitive Examination, for another candidate appearing in 2001. The seat was already used and they were domiciled. The court was ordered by the NWFP to use the seat and the Public Service Commission had never requested the Establishment Division nor advised that it should already appoint a NWFP quota for the department as C Section Section Competitive Examination for the year 2003 / Deduction, which did not follow any law, rules or any departmental instruction or order, had the effect of depriving a candidate of a seat that would otherwise Pass, the procedure adopted by the authorities was against the law.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• AL-MADAN COAL COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. v. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION 2009 CLD 645
• CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN v. Miss NASREEN PERVEZ 2009 PLC(CS) 650
• NAJAM AZIZ SETHI v. MUHAMMAD AZEEM BUTT 2009 SCMR 652
• DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER v. ROZI KHAN 2009 SCMR 663
• CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, QUAID-E-AZAM, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, KARACHI v. JAPAK INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE 2009 SCMR 666
• Mst. SALEEM AKHTAR v. Chaudhry SHAUK AHMED 2009 SCMR 673
• DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF CUSTOMS VALUATION v. ABDUL SHAKOOR ISMAIL KALOODI 2009 PTD 676
• MUHAMMAD SULEMAN v. SHAUKAT ALI 2009 SCMR 678

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

tax advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes