Sections 9/10 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were taken into account by the National Accountability Bureau Authority in their own name and in the name of their spouse, collecting the assets of the accused. The other assets as the beneficiary's total assets include 26 land-based properties, four industrial units and two hotel chains, all of which were acquired between 1990 and 1998, while the accused's accumulated wealth was calculated in 2004. Based on the market values of all the properties present at the time of filing the reference, the court failed to consider that the accused was negligent in 1985, irrespective of the fact that the property was acquired at a very low cost. Was the owner. He had valuable assets and in addition to his salary there were also sources of income that he could use to buy real estate. According to the Department of Wealth Tax's 1982 review of 1981, the value of movable assets owned by the accused was disclosed because the defendants set up mills with a small amount of money and the rest of the money was either. Was applied or was Borrowed from the bank, which was paid during the same period, the accused can only be held liable for the actual amount charged by him and not the total amount used to establish the mills, An income specification has already been provided. The forest and agricultural land were not even considered as a source of income for the accused, at a height of 7000 feet, without any idea, yet the National Accountability Arden
