Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION,ISLAMABAD versus IQBAL AHSAN ZAIDI

Article 212 (3) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the leave of section 4 appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court for consideration of other provisions of the Department, which the Service Tribunal referred to in Count VII (B) There was an error spreading the visual remarks recorded by the source. ) (iii) ie not yet suitable for development and in Part VI (a) (iv) the respondent is equal to the majority (average) of the ACR majority of the Government employee and only states that it has the former The requested edit is not supported. Parts of the ACR and that the Tribunal had waived the limitation in filing an appeal before the plaintiff and after the representative's authentic and compelling reasons were rejected.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 886
• MUHAMMAD UMAR alias UMRI v. State 2009 SCMR 891
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION 2009 SCMR 893
• IQBAL AHMED v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 903
• IFEANYI SAMSON v. State 2009 SCMR 909
• USMAN NASIR DAR v. State 2009 SCMR 911
• QADIR SHAH v. State 2009 SCMR 913
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2009 SCMR 916

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

top civil advocates from Sara e Naurang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes