KHALID SHAHAB ANSARI versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Sections 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 appeal to the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R5 (iii) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), presenting a major penalty for the termination of Section 4 service. Plaintiff was dismissed from his employment appeal under the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, stating that the order of dismissal was dismissed and the appellant filed the same under section 4 of the Service Tribunal Act 1973. Filed an appeal before the service tribunal and allowed the dismissal order to proceed against the department. The appellant was reinstated, giving himself the opportunity of self-defense, and under the same allegations against the appellant under R5 (iii) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Fresh proceedings were initiated against the inquiry. The Department did not accept the Appellant for regular inquiry and the Appellant's dismissal sentence was imposed. Regarding the formal inquiry appellant after the termination of the existing treatment, the Appeal to the Appeals Tribunal for the Appellant was filed that the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 were not implemented when A show cause notice was served on the appellant. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance was operating at the time of 2000, while the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 did not have the right to commence the de novo disciplinary proceedings because the removal of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000. , Which was supervising the law under section 11 of the said ordinance, shall determine, for the purpose of questioning the crime or innocence of an accused employee
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2010
