BOOTA MASIH versus DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH
Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 17 disciplinary proceedings resulted in the removal of the Selection Grade Appeal to Service Tribunal Appellant, dismissal of employment in the appeal filed by the Appellant and The appellant was instructed to resume the same position when the same appellant was removed from the job. When the appellant was removed from the job, the authorities gave selection grade to at least 10 juniors of the appellant. Was, but could not be considered for grant due to the dismissal of the appellant from his job. Said that the selection grade appellant had filed an appeal against the order under which his selection grade grant application was rejected as the appellant was ordered to be reinstated to the same position from which They were removed from the service, the possibility of seniority restoration and all other incidental rights / services will be restored in favor of the Selection Grade Appellant Grant, however, depending on the seniority based on P-seniority, the applicant is currently at The 10 juniors did not find anything illegal for a selection grade grant when the appellant's juniors If the selection was removed from a grant of the grade, it would create a vested right. Although the Appellant may have been reinstated to the Service, the Appellant may be considered for selection grade grant only if a Selection Grade designation according to the Rules was available without disrupting the position of Junior. Was given a selection grade.
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2010
