The FIR, which defined the provisions of Sections 16, 10 (3) and 10 (2), had disclosed that the alleged abductor had developed illicit relations with the accused and had voluntarily escaped with him. Was a well-married married woman, happily accompanied by her partner (accused). She lived with him for almost 8/9 months, did not mind and enjoyed sex with her, resulting in the fact that she was 12 weeks pregnant at the time of her naturalization. After his recovery he was found guilty under Section 16. The Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 was upheld and under Section 10 (3) of the said ordinance, its sentence was changed to Section 10 (2), which was punished for seven years. ? In such cases each count would have to be three years \ RI, which was to run simultaneously \ r \ n
