Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR versus STATE

Definitions of Section 10 (4) of the evidence were filed under the commission of adultery without delay, standing on the recording of prosecution witnesses by the accused along with the victim, according to the prosecution. Xena Bill Jaber committed with her, but later she pardoned one of them, which was a case of acquittal in favor of the defendant seeking a lesser sentence than was required by law. The perpetrators of the crime were sentenced, but their death sentence was reduced to the maximum benefit of Section 382B. Resolved by \ r \ n

Related judgments — Federal Shariat Court, 2010

• LIAQAT v. State 2010 PCrLJ 27
• QADIR BUKHSH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 75
• MUSTAFA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 96
• MAZHAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 118
• Mst. DURR-E-SHAHWAR BEGUM v. Haji BAKHTAWAR SAID MUHAMMAD 2010 PCrLJ 142
• WAHAB ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 157
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 174
• Dlr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad 2010 PLD 191

All Federal Shariat Court judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Goular Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes