Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) and 201 adultery cause the disappearance of evidence of murder, fine, murder, the benefit of doubt depends on the exploitation case only and only On the evidence of the situation. The last time the prosecution was seen based on the witness stand, was incomprehensible and it is worth noting that the deceased child fell into the canal in the morning and called the police at noon after taking his body out of the canal. Reportedly, statements made by the prosecution witnessed additional judicial confessions made by the accused before them, matching the words and the manner in which they were executed. Despite similarities, he made conflicting statements about his attitude. Even after he confessed to his guilt, the accused allegedly committed extra-judicial confession before two people. The complainant was accused of walking with his wife and he was accused of running against the accused. Was charged because he had told the complainant about his wife's infidelity that no crime was recovered from the accused before or after the confession. Prosecution case of only two suspects. Suspected extra-judicial confession made by the accused at the same time was stopped and at the same time the type presented in the case The last seen evidence of Yat could not be verified, the suspect was acquitted on suspicion of circumstances.
