Section Q 319 Q Cuttle Eye Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Appeal against the complaining complainant that the negligence of these four doctors resulted in the negligence of his wife in the hospital, private against him. The complaint was filed. He examined his and six other witnesses in support of which the trial court summoned the accused, but was subsequently acquitted on a plea made by him under section 265, Under the CRPC, a case was registered under Section 265 of the accused doctors under unknown order, CRPC was under trial court. On the basis of reasonable and careful consideration, or1818, in view of the meaning and breadth of the PPC, in the context of death caused by any rush or negligence, the accused punished under Section 191919. There was no possibility of this happening, the PPC conduct complained against the accused. Not in the form of negligence or negligence of any kind, because criminal conviction would be the primary and indispensable need for the preparation of medical evidence, especially in the field of medical negligence, which was not the cause. That is the fact that the complainant wants to buy and supply medicines from his sources, while the hospital requires that only the medicines officially obtained will be used, but to some extent it is not. Sheer negligence or negligence, which cannot be equated with negligence in any civil liability, was merely submitted by the complainant and his witnesses to the emptying of the oxygen cylinder and none of them was recovered, Not relevant to the witnesses
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
