Find a Lawyer

MUHAMM4D AYUB KHAN versus MST. SHEHLA RASHEED

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage on behalf of the wife ??? In order to pass the money, the family court shall approve the decree in favor of the wife with the applicant by the husband. The non-payment of respondents' dual money to declare her marriage as a plaintiff was not supported by the Family Court for the opportunity of reconciliation. And that he had changed his mind and wanted to keep his marriage with his maid's servant - as a divorcee, the applicant would be free to marry once the third person was married. Be able to re-marry respondents without the intervention of. Unexpected decision / interpretation of circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE LIMITED through Factory Manager v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2010 PLC 125
• THE STATE through Assistant Advocate-General, Sindh/Ex-Officio Public Prosecutor, Sukkur v. KHALID AHMED 2010 PCrLJ 126
• ABDULLAH alias SARDAR v. State 2010 YLR 126
• SONERI BANK LTD. v. DEWAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2010 CLD 130
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. Dr. IMTIAZ ALI MUGHAL 2010 PLD 134
• RECKITT BENCKISER PAKISTAN LTD. v. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 2010 CLD 135
• Mst. SHAMEEM AKHTAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 135
• GUL MUHAMMAD HAJANO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh 2010 PLC(CS) 137

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Bisham lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes