AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY versus SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.4
Section 25A & 65B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Complaint Request Dealworkman who received the accident remains under treatment, upon receipt of notice of duty, but the employer has discharged him on duty. Wormman submitted a complaint notice for redressal of the complaint and as the notice was not answered, the businessman delayed the labor court with a petition under section 65B of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 I filed a complaint, when employees filed a notice of complaint about a year later. Due to duty by doctors, since the notice of complaint was withheld over time, the application for complaint should also be considered as timely where the case was banned when the case court was in the process of disputing it. The delay in the petition for contempt of delay is a statement of what was done to delay the statement that the employee was kept on promises by the employer to the Labor Court-approved order to waive the delay. Placed aside and complaints filed by employees were dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
