Find a Lawyer

AFTAB HUSSAIN versus KARACHI PORT TRUST THROUGH BOARD OF TRUSTEES

O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and Section 151 the petition for a stay order was filed by the plaintiff in his favor under strange facts and the circumstances of this case and the balance of convenience is also in favor of the plaintiff, And if he was a resident of the land, he could not be compensated in the matter of money. The petition was allowed to the extent that the plaintiff was not allowed to deposit Rs. ? Period; and pay the municipal charges to the relevant departments within the stipulated period

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUJAHID HUSSAIN MEMON v. FEDERATON OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Gas, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 97
• MUHAMMAD LAIQ KHAN HAMDAM v. MUHAMMAD KHALIQ KHAN 2010 MLD 98
• MUZAMIL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 98
• ABDUL REHMAN v. ZIA-UL-HAQUE MAKHDOOM 2010 CLC 99
• AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. through Power of Attorney v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.4 2010 PLC 104
• ARSHAD HUSSAIN v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2010 PTD 104
• ZAKRIYA v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh/Home Department 2010 PLC(CS) 107
• SULTAN AHMED SIDDIQUI v. State 2010 PLD 110

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Jaranwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes