Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMAR versus GUL MUHAMMAD

OI, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Conduct of Constitutional Petition Party Filing an Application under OI, R10, CPC Following the decision of the OI, R10 and Decision Scope Request, C. Defendants filed a separate case in connection with the same disputed property by the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs filed after the PC's decision and order was passed but for the plaintiffs' case to be included as the defendant There was no petition filed before the trial court. And while the plaintiff was awaiting a final decision in the suit and finally the application was submitted under the trial court OI, R 10, the trial court could not enjoy it after the CPC decision and order came.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SHER ALI SHAH alias SHER MUHAMMAD SHAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue Department Sindh 2010 YLR 391
• YOUSUF MASIH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 392
• MUSHTAQ ALI SHAH v. N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI 2010 PLC(CS) 392
• FAROOQ SALEH CHOHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR through Secretary/Section Officer, Islamabad 2010 PLD 394
• RASHEED AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 398
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHAIKH v. PAK LIBYA HOLDING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Officer 2010 PLD 400
• NAKSHBANDI INDUSTRIES LTD. Through Factory Manager v. AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT through Presiding Officer 2010 PLC 401
• Mst. FOZIA v. AZIZULLAH 2010 CLC 403

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates phone number from Jaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes