Find a Lawyer

YOUSUF MASIH versus STATE

Section 497 will be included in the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 and the attempt to commit bail for Qatallah, only seven of the sixteen witnesses have been examined so far. After a further delay of eight days, the accused was arrested and sent to the Chemical Examiner. No independent witness was involved in the recovery process, the FIR did not allege that he was the victim of a death knife or a particular person. The statement under Rule Section 161 was also assigned to the accused, CCPI witnesses tried to improve their statements at the trial, every suspicion had to be given to the accused at the bailout stage, The accused was released on bail in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• APOLLO TEXTILES MILLS LTD. through Chief Financial Officer v. Mian FARHAT IQBAL 2010 CLC 389
• PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION through Authorized Officer v. RAZO (PVT.) LTD. through Director 2010 PLD 390
• MUHAMMAD HANEEF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 390
• SHER ALI SHAH alias SHER MUHAMMAD SHAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue Department Sindh 2010 YLR 391
• MUSHTAQ ALI SHAH v. N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI 2010 PLC(CS) 392
• FAROOQ SALEH CHOHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR through Secretary/Section Officer, Islamabad 2010 PLD 394
• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 397
• RASHEED AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 398

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes