Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD versus BASHOO MAL

Section 10 and 151 Accounts Proposal, Decline of Business, Recovery of Dignity and Supply of Suits for Poultry Feed Contract The short supply of feed by the plaintiff plaintiff denied not only the plaintiff's claim against it In the amount of the written statement claims the plaintiff for feed and profit, but a lawsuit has been filed for its recovery, after which the trial court rejected the plaintiff's request for a trial and dismissed the plaintiff's case. Reinforced both suits by acting as a moderate party. The two suits were suing each other in connection with the business transaction, but the relief sought in their respective suit was not substantially the same as the relief sought by the defendant by the defendant. The plaintiff could not be allowed in the case filed by the High Court. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• RIZWAN HANIF v. State 2010 YLR 888
• EXIDE PAKISTAN LIMITED v. PAKISTAN ACCUMULATORS (PVT.) LIMITED 2010 CLD 890
• SHARAFUDDIN KHASHKELI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 891
• KASHIF AZEEM v. Mst. TAHIRA ANJUM 2010 MLD 892
• NAZIR AHMED TUNIO v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED 2010 CLD 894
• RIAZ AHMED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Government of Sindh, Board of Revenue at Hyderabad 2010 PLC(CS) 894
• SPEEDWAY FONDMETALL, PAKISTAN LTD. v. NIB BANK LTD.(Formerly PICIC) 2010 CLD 896
• SALMAN ALVI v. UNITED BANK LTD. through President 2010 MLD 899

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Ubaro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes