SALMAN ALVI versus UNITED BANK LTD. THROUGH PRESIDENT
Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AKXNX, RR1 and 2 and Section 151 suit plots were leased to the private defendants in the year 1977, for declaration and injunction, thereafter Plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff's purchase of a subdivision plot in 1987 by a plaintiff by a plaintiff in a subdivision of the suit plot in three small plots and obtaining physical possession of it by the plaintiff The entire suit of the plaintiff's plot is the mortgage of the plaintiff to grant temporary injunction against the will. The interim injunction under section 151, Rule 1 and 2, read with CPC, is that the status quo is retained as the date of the trial, on the occasion of the trial. Will be banned from preventing an injury and creating a new situation while such an application will be considered. Even if the first case is in favor of the applicant; if it refuses the injunction it may cause irreparable harm / loss / injury. And whether the balance of the facility is in his favor or not but the evidence cannot be recorded without having to rely on the facts or the parties on the basis that the plaintiff's favor in the case for permanent possession of the plaintiff plot from 1988 onwards. available. Failure to order the conditional matter will be irreparable to the detriment of the plaintiff and the plaintiff will suffer. The balance of the disadvantage was in favor of the plaintiff; the fate of the suit could not be decided without recording the evidence, so the matter could be preserved until the decision was made. Changing hands will require that in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
