Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN HANIF versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 420 and 506 (2) Before the arrest of fraud and criminal threats, confirm the dispute between the accused and the complainant's family. In such cases, the allegations contained in the FIR cannot be taken lightly and accurately, unless the complainant has succeeded in registering the FIR after a delay of 50 days. Mill's mill had a significant effect in the cumulus. The alleged crime cannot be ruled out; pre-arrest bail was granted to the accused under the circumstances, it was confirmed, r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ELI LILLY AND COMPANY through Authorized Signatory v. ATCO LABORATORIES (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive 2010 CLD 876
• Master GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 MLD 877
• SHAHEEN FREIGHTS SERVICES through Proprietor v. EBRAHIM TRUST through Managing Trustee 2010 CLC 878
• HADI BUX v. State 2010 MLD 885
• EXIDE PAKISTAN LIMITED v. PAKISTAN ACCUMULATORS (PVT.) LIMITED 2010 CLD 890
• SHARAFUDDIN KHASHKELI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 891
• KASHIF AZEEM v. Mst. TAHIRA ANJUM 2010 MLD 892
• NASEER AHMAD v. BASHOO MAL 2010 CLC 893

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

divorce advocates from Tando Adam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes