Find a Lawyer

ARIF UMER versus MUHAMMAD SHAMIM KHURSHEED

Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Deletion of Tenant All Proof of Offering Tenant Finding Reality Based on Sub-Letting But Lower Appellate Court Reversed Controller's Detection on Rent Dismissed and dismissed request. Article 199 of the Constitution cannot serve as an appeal court on the question of fact, the facts recorded by the competent tribunal or court may be interfered with by the High Court under the jurisdiction of the Constitution if it is based on any evidence Or not recorded. The finding of facts cannot be interfered with by ignoring the material evidence on the record y The High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, recorded by the lower appellate court merely on the basis that a different view was possible based on the same material. The information was in accordance with the evidence available on the record and did not demand any intervention by the High Court Petition. Dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• M. MUHAMMAD SHAFI & CO. v. A. REHMAN ENTERPRISES 2010 CLD 920
• Dr. MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR YOUSFANI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2010 PLC(CS) 920
• MUHAMMAD HANIF S. KALIA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 921
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI 2010 PTD 922
• TANZIL-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. SEEMA BEGUM 2010 YLR 926
• ABDUL MANNAN BHUTTO v. State 2010 MLD 927
• Mst. RAHEELA YASMEEN v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2010 CLC 935
• KOHISAR ENTERPRISES v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2010 CLD 935

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

advocate for immigration from Bhimbar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes