Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MANNAN BHUTTO versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 8s 324/353/392/34 Fine murder and attempted robbery, in the absence of the presence of any injury to both parties in the inquiry, granting further investigation Given the delay between the time of the arrest and the time of the arrest of the accused, the case against the accused is related to the offense committed under Sections 353 and 324, the PPC was not excluded from the facts and circumstances. The accused was admitted on bail in the case

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD HANIF S. KALIA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 921
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI 2010 PTD 922
• ARIF UMER v. MUHAMMAD SHAMIM KHURSHEED 2010 CLC 925
• TANZIL-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. SEEMA BEGUM 2010 YLR 926
• Mst. RAHEELA YASMEEN v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2010 CLC 935
• KOHISAR ENTERPRISES v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2010 CLD 935
• IMDAD ALI v. State 2010 MLD 937
• DAWLANCE ELECTRONICS (PVT.) LIMITED through Director, Karachi v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI 2010 PTD 940

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Sukkur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes