Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR YOUSFANI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

It was also after the conclusion of the judgment of the proceedings submitted by the apex court that the section 2A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 189, 190 and 199 constitutional petition was made by the High Court. Was the appeal / action filed by the applicant before the service tribunal? Requiring automatic or judicial order In view of the difficulties indicated by the applicants of the justification, the High Court allowed the applicants thirty days to apply for a court order on their appeals by the service tribunal. Refer to The High Court directed that consideration of the existing petitions be pending and after the decision by the service tribunal, its order will be lifted. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MEHBOOB AHMAD SOOMRO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 911
• SADIQ BROTHERS v. II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE KARACHI South 2010 MLD 913
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 914
• M. MUHAMMAD SHAFI & CO. v. A. REHMAN ENTERPRISES 2010 CLD 920
• MUHAMMAD HANIF S. KALIA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 921
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI 2010 PTD 922
• ARIF UMER v. MUHAMMAD SHAMIM KHURSHEED 2010 CLC 925
• TANZIL-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. SEEMA BEGUM 2010 YLR 926

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Abbaspur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes