Section 6 of the West Pakistan Rules, R21 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 555 Termination of a marital action under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961; / The husband had contracted a second marriage. Without her prior consent and consent, the wife also alleged that the husband had not filed a petition to the Nazim Union Council seeking permission to file a mediation council complaint, demanding that the civil judge and the Judicial Magistrate file the union council. What was in the front of the filing instructions as well. However, the relevant appellate court set aside the trial court's order and received remand - ???? Received a complaint remand with instructions to record the wife's husband's statement, which filed an application to terminate the proceedings, which The provisions of section 6 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 were not implemented. Consider an action by a private person, which can only be initiated by what was provided under the law regarding the validation of the Union Council, which had to be followed in the same manner and the aggrieved party trial court However, it was not intended by the lawyers that the court should approach the Supreme Court for the removal of Article 6 (the aggrieved party) Family Law Ordinance, of 1961 of Except that the Union Council shall have jurisdiction over this matter in a number of marital matters, as has been said, in order to initiate the section. The rejection does not consider the delegation of authority. In the present case, a case has been filed by the Union Council
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
