The testimony contained in Section 9 (b) of the narcotic evidence was charged during the examination under Section 342, the CCP accepted the allegation and admitted the perpetrator in this case with no evidence other than that. There was no other witness except the deployment of this police officer who was investigated by the prosecution as a consultant. The trial court's acquittal was acquitted by the trial court, notwithstanding the coercive method adopted by the court, which led to the trial court's request for the same evidence and reasons. Only the accused was convicted. If the offender, who has been denied and has not been prosecuted, will not be made the basis of conviction, if no competent case is presented, the mere conviction of the accused will be the basis of the law. Will not And the court was obliged to ensure that the guilty plea or confession request must be aligned with the guilt of a reasonable, voluntary, without greed, promise or coercion. The court concluded that no evidence was presented to prove the charges against the two accused. The result should not have been different for the accused. In the case of an unknown decision requesting guilt and punishment, the crime should be requested. If the trial court finds that there is no evidence against the accomplices after conducting the entire case on the merits, the trial court has otherwise found that such evidence was for the accused on the evidence. How to prosecute and plead guilty verdict?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
