Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392, 397, 341 and 34 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Robbery, robbery, wrongful conduct on any person and false bail. Preventing, the accused denied the police arrested him shortly after the incident in which the police pursued with the stolen property and the police and the complainant after the incident, arrested the accused. The other accused was named by and no evidence has been recorded yet that there is no bail approval case in this case. His request was rejected after the bail was terminated

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Haji INAYAT v. State 2010 PCrLJ 825
• REAL TRADING CO. through Wali Muhammad, Karachi v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF PaCCS, KARACHI 2010 PTD 826
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. PROGAS PAKISTAN LIMITED 2010 CLD 828
• SURRIYA BEGUM v. CITY NAZIM, CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2010 PLC(CS) 832
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. NAYA DOUR MOTORS (PVT.) LIMITED 2010 CLD 838
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2010 MLD 839
• RAHIB ALI v. State 2010 YLR 844
• MVIUHAMMAD SERAJULHAQ SYED v. M.V. BANGLAR MAYA 2010 CLD 848

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

patent advocate from Upper Deval lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes