Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus K.A. BASHIR

A IX, R 3 and O XIV, R 1 The dismissal of the claim for illegal prosecution was decided to settle matters, but no one was present for the plaintiff, nor the plaintiff's proposed matters. In this case, the defendant's dispute was to be resolved and the matter was for trial and since the plaintiff had lost his interest, the case could be dismissed for non-prosecution. The due date was the date of the hearing and in the absence of the plaintiff, the trial must be excluded in absentia. Prosecution suit dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. MUHAMMAD YOUSUF 2010 CLC 1021
• PERAC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (PRDF), KARACHI v. NATIONAL REFINERY LIMITED 2010 YLR 1024
• TAHIR AHMED ZAHID v. State 2010 MLD 1027
• TAHIR OMER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. SIDDIQUI SONS SYNDICATE 2010 MLD 1032
• M. NAEEM v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Province of Sindh 2010 PCrLJ 1039
• SULEMAN v. State 2010 MLD 1040
• RELIANCE CONSULTANCY AND ENGINEERING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 CLC 1046
• Mst. KHATOON v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2010 PCrLJ 1046

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

lawer from fb area from Rabwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes