RELIANCE CONSULTANCY AND ENGINEERING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 2 (a) (b) (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Invitation of Constitutional Tenders Following the rejection of the lowest bids, the lower bid submitted by the applicants for tendering is the responsibility of the respondents. The title is not correct. Because the applicant's bid was the lowest, he would not be eligible for a tender award. According to the public works, he could not reject the lower bid without giving any proper reason. If the applicant's bid was rejected as unresponsive and another person's bid was accepted, the Supreme Court could enter into the question of whether the applicant's bid was unresponsive in the circumstances. Whether it was legitimate or not, the High Court rejected the constitutional petition and said that if the authority took part in the new tenders and the applicants, the bid should be assessed with justice. In a fair, fair and transparent manner and this tender must be strictly awarded in accordance with the law and the rules, while the highest degree of probability ndards \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
