Find a Lawyer

TAHIR AHMED ZAHID versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 379 and 427 of the theft and misdemeanor ad interim pre-arrest bail, arrest warrant was approved before the accused was confirmed, but the police did not present the invoice so that the evidence. Was not visible at the time. , If the accused had committed a crime for which he was charged with the offense for which he was charged, he would not fall under the prohibited clause of section 497; Who has misused the bail discount to the accused, before the bail bail is confirmed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SALEEM MEHTAB v. REFHAN BEST FOOD LTD. COMPANY through Chief Executive 2010 MLD 1015
• COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION), LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, KARACHI v. PARACHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 1016
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. MUHAMMAD YOUSUF 2010 CLC 1021
• PERAC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (PRDF), KARACHI v. NATIONAL REFINERY LIMITED 2010 YLR 1024
• TAHIR OMER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. SIDDIQUI SONS SYNDICATE 2010 MLD 1032
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. K.A. BASHIR 2010 CLC 1039
• M. NAEEM v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Province of Sindh 2010 PCrLJ 1039
• SULEMAN v. State 2010 MLD 1040

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Daulat Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes