Attempts to impose sanctions after section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 324, 337 F (v), 504, 147, 148 and 149, the grant of the charges against the accused was the same as the rifle and The co-accused was armed with a gun. The complainant was fired at the party. The accused was assigned the role of firing on the leg of the prosecution witness, but the FIR was silent, even though the suspect repeated the fire, when the complainant and his injured brother. He was clearly at his mercy, there was nothing revealed to any of the complainants or any of his injured brothers by the accused on account of death or murder. Asbestine to: I just got an injury on the injured. It was also an unimportant part of his physical record; he also showed a lack of intent on the killer in response to questions about the application of section 324, after examining the prosecution's testimony. The PPC was yet to settle the case that in filing an FIR delay of ten hours, it was not explained by the complainant with the dispute, the dispute was also found in the medical and the ocular testimony was not recovered from the accused. Who was allegedly armed with a gun, bail was granted before the arrest of the landed property between the parties. There was also a dispute between the parties in connection with the civil suit. Medical evidence revealed a contradiction with the ocular evidence. The final challan of the case had already been presented and the accused no longer needed further investigation. Was able He was also allowed in the case of bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
