Find a Lawyer

NIZAMUDDIN versus NOOR HASSAN

The witnesses supported the prosecution's version, with section 2302 (c) Qatil-Am complaining of an increase in conviction; judicial confession made by the accused was not confirmed, the accused's guilt was well established. Had gone and had committed a judicial confession and had proved a judicial confession. The police are investigating and the crime was found to be a crime for the accused, as a matter of self-esteem and family honor, and his judicial confession indicated that such facts were collectively. Came out The defendant's plea was dismissed as he served to ease the circumstances and did not deserve to extend his sentence.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MAQBOOL MASIH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1306
• MUHAMMAD ASER JAN v. BILQUIS BEGUM 2010 YLR 1317
• THE STATE/ANTI NARCOTICS FORCE through Deputy Director (Law), Karachi v. MUHAMMAD ADEEL HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 1322
• RASOOL BUX v. HUSSAIN BUX 2010 CLC 1324
• Syed WASIM SHAH v. State 2010 YLR 1329
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL KAMDAR v. MUHAMMAD TAHIR AHMADANI 2010 CLC 1335
• INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES LTD. 2010 CLD 1337
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. State 2010 MLD 1342

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

divorce advocates from Kharan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes